Talk:PGXN

From PostgreSQL wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
It already provides many facilities needed for development
 
It already provides many facilities needed for development
and is being quite used. It already supports versioned file distribution.
+
and is being quite used. Developers can already neatly package
 +
and upload their stuff. It already supports versioned file distribution.
 
It is just not well enough integrated with actual running database one
 
It is just not well enough integrated with actual running database one
 
is using in practice.
 
is using in practice.
Line 21: Line 22:
 
control.xml or pg_package.xml), which would contain the required data.
 
control.xml or pg_package.xml), which would contain the required data.
 
Perhaps XML and/or RDF would be a good choice for this?
 
Perhaps XML and/or RDF would be a good choice for this?
 +
 +
At the very least, it would seem sensible to have some kind of correspondence
 +
between extension names and PgFoundry projects.
  
 
--[[User:Ziga|Ziga]] 18:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Ziga|Ziga]] 18:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:24, 27 May 2010

Possible FAQ Addition

How to pronounce PGAN? (P-G-An, P-Gan?)

PgFoundry considered useful

Why not use PgFoundry as a place for uploading extensions?

It already provides many facilities needed for development and is being quite used. Developers can already neatly package and upload their stuff. It already supports versioned file distribution. It is just not well enough integrated with actual running database one is using in practice.

PgDEX could periodically (say once a day) download all changed published .tar.gz files (but not stuff in SCM) and compile them into installable packages. These would be installed by special command line utility, as suggested.

What seems to be needed with this is a way to specify meta-information in packages; this could be in a form of a required file (say control, control.xml or pg_package.xml), which would contain the required data. Perhaps XML and/or RDF would be a good choice for this?

At the very least, it would seem sensible to have some kind of correspondence between extension names and PgFoundry projects.

--Ziga 18:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools